Every few months, we get
faster and bigger SSDs, at equal or lower prices
than the previous generation. In this article,
we will examine the performance of four drives of
this season's harvest from Crucial, OCZ, Samsung and
newcomer, Western Digital.


The most important specs here to
take note are the 6Gbps SATA interface and
all-important TRIM support. Crucial also
provides field-upgradable firmware and a solid
3-year warranty. Using Crystal Disk Info,
here are the drive's detected SMART and other
parameters:

Here are Crystal DiskMark test
results with a standard 3Gbps SATA controller:

But of course, this is a 6Gbps
SSD, so we must test with a 6Gbps controller -
AMD's AWESEOME SB850 on a Gigabyte 890FX
motherboard. Here's what we got:


Hah, we're not done yet.
We tried the same drive on an LSI 9260-8i 6Gbps
SAS RAID controller, and this is what happened:

Well, that's going to be a tough
act to follow. Next, we look at everyone's
de-facto choice for SSD, the OCZ Vertex 2:

Unlike other manufacturer's
whose largest capacity drives usually perform
the best, the Vertex 2 middle-tier has top
specs:

For this article, we tested the
100GB model, their most popular one.
Crystal Disk Info:

And here are it's test results
with the latest v1.24 firmware:

As most of us know so well,
sequential numbers mean little to real-world,
daily computing performance. It's the 4K
random writes that really slow us down.
OCZ really tweaked their firmware to maximize
this performance at the expense of sequential
writes.
Third in our roundup is the
Samsung 470-Series 256GB SSD.

Their
website has no useful tech specs, so let's just
show you the Crystal Disk Info:

Samsung performed very well,
sequentially, but not as good as the OCZ:

Lastly, we come to the newcomer
to the bunch, the Western Digital SiliconEdge
Blue 128GB SSD:

|
WD SiliconEdge
Blue 128 GB SATA Solid State Drives
( SSC-D0128SC-2100)

|
Physical Specifications |
|
 |
Capacity |
128 GB |
 |
Interface |
SATA 3 Gb/s |
 |
Form
Factor |
2.5-inch
Drive |
 |
RoHS
Compliant |
6/6 |
 |
User
Sectors Per Drive |
250,069,680 |
 |

|
Performance Specifications |
|
|
Target
Performance |
 |
Interface
Burst Speed |
3 Gb/s |
 |
Sustained
Read Speed |
Up to 250
MB/s |
 |
Sustained
Write Speed |
Up to 170
MB/s |
 |
MTBF |
1,400,000
hours |
 |
Error Rate
(non-recoverable) |
< 1 in 1015 bits
read |
 |
|
Operational Lifespan |
 |
Read |
Unlimited |
 |
Write |
35 GB/Day |
 |

|
Physical Dimensions |
|
|
English |
 |
Height |
0.40
Inches |
 |
Depth |
3.9 Inches |
 |
Width |
2.75
Inches |
 |
|
Metric |
 |
Height |
9.5 mm |
 |
Depth |
98.9 mm |
 |
Width |
69.86 mm |
 |

|
Power Management |
|
 |
DC Input
Voltage |
5V |
 |
Read (Peak
Watts) |
2.00 Watts |
 |
Write
(Peak Watts) |
3.5 Watts |
 |
Sleep
(Idle Watts) |
0.60 Watts |
 |

|
Environmental Specifications |
|
|
Shock |
 |
Operating
Shock |
1000 G,
Half-sine, 0.5ms Duration, 50g
Pk, MIL-STD-810F, Method 516.5,
Procedure I |
 |
|
Temperature (Metric) |
 |
Standard
Temperature (c) |
0° C to
70° C |
 |
Non-operating |
-55°C to
125°C |
 |
|
Humidity |
 |
Operating |
8% to 95%
Non-condensing |
 |
|
Altitude (English) |
 |
Operating |
80,000ft,
MIL-STD-810F, Method 500.4,
Procedure II |
 |
|
Vibration |
 |
Operating |
16.3gRMS,
MIL-STD-810F, Method 514.5,
Procedure I, Category 24 |
 |
|

This newbie has got some growing
up to do:

Conclusion:
The OCZ Vertex 2 is still the
choice for an OS boot drive because of its
balanced performance especially the 4K random
writes and reads. But the Crucial C300 is
closing fast, really fast. With the
combination of native 6Gbps coming soon to more
and more chipsets, and improvements in firmware,
the Crucial is poised to take the crown from the
OCZ. Unless, OCZ brings 6Gbps support!
Now what if you're NOT looking for a boot drive?
Well, the C300 becomes the clear winner in that
case.



