Top
www.TREADLAYERS.com
brainiac at treadlayers dot com

Est. 2003
A non-profit site dedicated to
reviewing nothing but the best.

   
 

 

Left Menu
MENU
    Home
    PC HW
    CE
    CAR HW
    MISC HW
    EMAIL

News
 


News
 



 

 

 

PROMISE EX4650 + 4x FUJITSU MBA3300RC

Test Results


Here we go with the all-important test results:


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 64k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-0, 1024k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

The bigger 1MB stripe size improved read speeds quite noticeably.  Impressive either way!


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-1E, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-1E, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-1E, 64k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

Wow, for a RAID-1E array, that's actually not too bad.  I think the controller is reading from more than one disk, but still struggles (as others do) writing to all the disks at the same time.


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 64k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

 


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-5, 1024k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

RAID-5 is better than RAID-1E, but write speeds still drastically lower than reads.


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 64k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-6, 1024k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

Changing the array to a RAID-6 makes writes plummet further. 


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 64k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 64k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 8MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 1024k stripe
HD Tach v3.0.1.0, 32MB Zones


Promise EX4650 + 4x Fujitsu MBA3300RC in RAID-10, 1024k stripe
ATTO Disk Benchmark

Lastly in RAID-10 arrays, we get a better balance of writes and reads.  But then again, it's RAID-10... 


     
  1.  Introduction NEXT: Conclusion
  2.  Test Results  
  3.  Conclusion  
     
 

 



Site Sponsors

 
Copyright

Copyright © 2003-2008. All Rights Reserved.