|
DUAL XEON MBs with PAXVILLE, WOODCREST and CLOVERTOWN CPUs

Introduction
Many of us enthusiasts have used both Opterons
and Xeons in the past. Only recently have
Xeons come back to match and even exceed the
performance numbers of similarly-priced AMD Opterons.
Here, we will examine the performance differences
between the three generations of multi-core Xeons -
Paxville, Woodcrest, and Clovertown. Clock
speed, architecture, and number of execution
threads/cores will all factor come into play here.
Furthermore, chipset differences should also
demonstrate measurable results.
Paxville is Intel's first dual-core Xeon.
This is also one of the last Xeons based on the
older 90nm NetBurst architecture, which means it
supports Hyper-Threading. With two cores, two
sockets, and two hyper-threads, a dual-Paxville
system results in eight execution cores!
|
Codename |
Paxville DP |
|
Socket |
604 |
|
Architecture |
NetBurst |
|
Model Number |
7030 |
|
L2 Cache |
2 x 2MB |
|
sSpec |
SL8MA |
|
Clock speed |
2.8 GHz |
|
FSB |
800 MHz |
|
Multiplier |
14x |
|
Voltage |
1.287v - 1.412v |
|
TDP |
135W |
|
Instruction Set
Support |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3,
Hyper-Threading, XD, EM64T |

Woodcrest is a dual-core
Xeon based on the Core2 architecture. These
CPUs use the 65nm process. Our test system
will use the fastest model, the 5160 at 3.0GHz and a
1333MHz FSB.
|
Codename |
Woodcrest |
|
Socket |
771 |
|
Architecture |
Core 2 |
|
L2 Cache |
4MB |
|
Model Number |
Dual Core Xeon 5110 |
Dual Core Xeon 5120 |
Dual Core Xeon 5130 |
Dual Core Xeon 5140 |
Dual Core Xeon 5150 |
Dual Core Xeon 5160 |
|
sSpec |
SL9RZ |
SL9RY |
SL9RX |
SL9RW |
SL9RU |
SL9RT |
|
Clock speed |
1.60 GHz |
1.86 GHz |
2.00 GHz |
2.33 GHz |
2.66 GHz |
3.00 GHz |
|
FSB |
1066 MHz |
1066 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
|
Multiplier |
6x |
7x |
6x |
7x |
8x |
9x |
|
TDP |
65W |
65W |
65W |
65W |
65W |
80W |
|
Instruction Set
Support |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |

Lastly, we have the
quad-core Clovertown. These CPUs also use the 65nm
process. We only have an E5320 1.86GHz test
platform, but its slower speed should be somewhat
equivalent to the 5160 Woodcrest above in terms of
cost.
|
Codename |
Clovertown |
|
Socket |
771 |
|
Architecture |
Core 2 |
|
L2 Cache |
2x 4MB |
|
Model Number |
Quad Core Xeon E5310 |
Quad Core Xeon E5320 |
Quad Core Xeon E5335 |
Quad Core Xeon E5345 |
Quad Core Xeon X5355 |
Quad Core Xeon X5365 |
|
sSpec |
SL9XR |
SL9MV |
SL9YK |
SL9YL |
SL9YM |
SL9YZ |
|
Clock speed |
1.60 GHz |
1.86 GHz |
2.00 GHz |
2.33 GHz |
2.66 GHz |
3.00 GHz |
|
FSB |
1066 MHz |
1066 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
1333 MHz |
|
Multiplier |
6x |
7x |
6x |
7x |
8x |
9x |
|
Voltage |
1.5v |
1.5v |
1.162-1.200v |
1.162-1.200v |
1.162-1.200v |
1.162-1.200v |
|
TDP |
80W |
80W |
80W |
80W |
120W |
150W |
|
Instruction Set
Support |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
XD, EM64T, VT, EIST |

Thanks to Wikipedia for the
information above.
Memory used in the test were
supplied by Kingston and Apacer:


The next most important component here is the
power supply, to ensure stability.
Naturally, the PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750
was used:

For cooling the Xeons, the Verax X21 Heatpipe
coolers were used. These are the quietest,
best-cooling Xeon heatsinks / heatpipes we've
found. Each heatsink consists of six
copper heatpipes mounted on a solid aluminum
base, a numerous array of aluminum thin-fins, an
aluminum shroud, and two fans. Both fans
are mounted on rubber, further reducing noise.
The only requirement for the X21 to work is that
the chassis MUST have Xeon heatsink mounting
holes. Check out these photos:
   
    
Each motherboard was tested using the following
benchmarking software:
-
Si Software Sandra 2007 Lite
-
CPUMark 2.1
-
Prime95 v24.14
-
SuperPi 1.1
-
DVD Shrink 3.2 (rip same
pressed DVD movie with compression, in-depth
analysis, with sharpening)
-
Cinebench 9.5
-
Memtest86+
-
WinRAR 3.41
We also measured power
consumption using the
Seasonic PowerAngel. Screenshots will
be shown on each board's page while final
results and other test data will be summarized
on page 8.
Now, onto the
motherboards...
|