Top
www.TREADLAYERS.com
brainiac at treadlayers dot com

Est. 2003
A non-profit site dedicated to
reviewing nothing but the best.

   
 

 

Left Menu
MENU
    Home
    PC HW
    CE
    CAR HW
    EMAIL

News
 


News
 



 

 

 

PCIe Video Card Compilation

Introduction


We are not hardcore gamers here.  You all know that we are more into workstation performance and A/V HTPC design.  So as new video cards come out, how do we know which one is best for specified requirements?  Best in 3D up to a certain price or power consumption?  Best in HQV?  Well, as technology progresses, the answers continuously change as well.  In an attempt to maintain a record of various video cards' relative performance, we are going to continually update this article with new video cards and their test results. 

Tests, unless otherwise noted, were performed on the following platform:

The operating system is Windows XP Professional 64-bit Edition.  Latest drivers at the time were used.  For HQV tests, WMP9 was used.  For nVidia-based GPUs, PureVideo decoder 1.02.223 was also used for post-processing.

  Peak
Power
Idle
Power
3DMark
03
3DMark
05
3DMark
06
HQV Notes Images
ATI X1950XTX 214W 139W 18091 10521 5838 118 DX10-capable, but too big, too power hungry
2x ATI X1950XTX in CrossFire 339W 139W 30555 11713 7960 WNR Very fast DX10, but too big, too power hungry, no DVD playback
GeCube
X1650Pro
149W 94W 9824 5720 2651 118 Low power consumption, mediocre performance
GeCube
X1650XT
149W 100W 11979 7462 3292 118 Low power consumption, slightly better performance than X1650Pro
Asus 8600GTS 143W 111W 16917 DNF 5265 130 Good performance, great video quality playback
Zogis 8400GS 126W 101W 4813 2852 1427 115 Very inexpensive, not enough muscle for even good video playback
Zotac 8800GT 173W 111W 31945 11655 7927 130 Best value by far.  Powerful 3D, low power, perfect HQV

 

 

 

Site Sponsors

       

 

 
 
Copyright

Copyright © 2003-2008. All Rights Reserved.